From the Vault: Communication and Trust

I’m going to want you to be honest with me here and honest with yourself.

Think back to the times where you had a lot of apprehension, anxiety and mistrust. These memories can come from the work environment or your personal life. Maybe you thought your job was going to be eliminated. Maybe you were being audited and did nothing wrong. Maybe your spouse was out late and didn’t call to check in. Maybe you were waiting for some medical test results back and hadn’t heard for a few days. Maybe you hadn’t gotten a call or text you were expecting for a friend.

I know those are not pleasant memories and we won’t be staying here long.

Each of those examples and most others like it have one single cause point: communication frequency. Communication, even a simple update can ease most of the apprehension, anxiety and mistrust described above and failure to communicate and the march of time will continue to grow those highly negative emotions and fears.

The balance of this article will take two very divergent angels in how to deal with communication frequency and the impact on trust.

Over Communicate

Quite simply tell people what you are up to and what you are doing. As a leader, you can’t afford any lapses in trust that are so easily curable as you communicating with affected team members. Your team can’t read your mind and they don’t automatically know what you are doing and your motives. You have to tell them.

A couple of the best models to use include regular team meetings to insure that everyone is hearing the same thing and that will eliminate the in-the-know jealousy that sometimes develops when insiders know what is going on and others don’t. To reduce the risk of trust lapses, these meetings should be weekly or every two weeks.

One-on-one meetings allow team members a better forum to ask questions and dive deeper into subjects than in a group setting. When done monthly, it allows for a lot of clarifications and amplifications where needed.

Daily huddles are another great tool to give brief updates on what is happening in short term basis and it makes sure everyone has the same level of communication on a daily basis.

One final consideration is the use of technology in communication. I started to count the ways people can communicate with me through the written word and social platforms. There is email, text, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Google + and Instagram. Within each of those, there are subsets of groups, pages, forums and instant messages. The excuse of not having a way to connect with team members left with the dialup modem.

Some of the good examples of using technology to assist in communication frequency include using private groups to post project updates, using group notifications to spread the word about a new team member and using social media with tags to share key news. This method of communication will become more and more prevalent as millennials dominate the workplace (they check their social media before email).

Self-Management and Expecting Better

The divergent side of communication and trust involves a bit of self-management, emotional intelligence and changing your expectations. By a big part, this is harder but the long-term value is very high.

Just because you don’t hear something doesn’t mean something is bad or something is wrong. In a perfect world, you would know and have access to the information you need when you need it but we do not live in that realm.

So there are times you don’t know and don’t get the communication that builds and maintains trust. The reaction to that situation is now up to you. You can choose to be fearful or you can choose to expect a positive outcome. That choice rests entirely with you.

The other reminder here is that you have almost no control over how people choose to communicate with you. If they communicate frequently, infrequently, disjointedly, harshly or not at all. You can control your reaction but not control the communication.

“Fear is that little darkroom where negatives are developed.”
Michael Pritchard

Like many subjects related to self-management and your emotions, this is not one that can be cured by reading an article or looking at a motivating picture. You will have to commit to changing your reaction to these situations and begin a journey where you will have to remind yourself regularly of your control over the reaction and not the lack of communication you are receiving.

The two sides of communication and trust. Over-communicate when you are owning and driving the event and manage your reaction when you are the expected receiver of the communication.

From the Vault: Doing the Right Thing in Leadership

Leadership is full of the opportunity to do the right thing. Leadership is also full of penalties. The penalty of not having a bad day. The penalty of not getting to utilize excuses. The penalty of not getting to forget about your mission.

No leadership opportunity may be as great or penalty as large when the right thing is involved.

Think about this scenario. Your boss, the company president, tells you to do something about Bob. She clearly has not liked Bob since the day she arrived and it appears that her and Bob have some type of personality conflict. You fully believe that Bob is meeting all required standards and making headway to become an executive. Do you confront Bob? Do you stand up to the president? Do you try to hit a middle ground and negotiate a solution acceptable to the president and protecting Bob on some levels?

Or maybe a little darker scenario. You are aware that a peer is being sexually harassed at work. You have talked with her and suggested that she talk to human resources or the CEO. She refuses and her behavior, job performance and demeanor deteriorate almost daily. The individual harassing her has authority over you and is widely liked and respected in the company. Furthermore, the harasser generates a significant amount of income for the company. Do you ignore the situation? After all, she knows the policy and she is a big person and can report the harassment if it bothers her. Do you report the harassment and risk the loss of your credibility and even your job?

How about something a little more tame and a lot more common? Your boss talks to you about the failing performance of your peer manager. He says that he trusts you and trusts your judgment. Do you pile on and add your comments that throw your peer under the bus? Do you remain silent? Do you protest and indicate that this dialog is not appropriate? Do you bask in the glory of having the boss indicate that he trusts you?

One more. There is animosity between you and a key sales person. The behavior has risen to the level that she tells lies about you and your operational team members. Do you confront her and tell her the behavior is inappropriate and must stop? Do you go tell her boss? Do you retaliate and wage a campaign of lies and exaggerations about her?

Many times, doing the right thing has penalties. In leadership, those penalties are magnified because there are less safety nets for team members in leadership positions. People in leadership positions are more visible so when they face issues of ethical penalty, it is more widely known. Although you can never avoid the penalties for doing the right thing, there are a couple of skills that can be embraced to reduce the impact of them.

The first course of action is to employ a consistent approach with all team members and in all situations. This approach also become proactive because people know that you take the high ground on a consistent basis and not just when it is convenient for you. This requires you not react and demonstrate a great deal of emotional intelligence in all interactions within the organization.

The other skill, and perhaps the hardest, is to remove the “what’s in it for me” thought process. This forces you to not think about how possible consequences might affect you in an adverse manner and focus only on doing the right thing. Some people will label this as courage or as the same thinking that propels policemen towards gunfire. It is the instantaneous processing of risk versus doing the right thing with the right thing always winning.

Finally, a leader must be able to reconcile their action against long term and very personal consequences. Can you sleep with your action or inaction? Does your action or inaction cause you unease and nervousness? Would your mom be proud of what you did or did not do? These little tests can prove a powerful learning ground for doing the right thing.

Almost as a postscript, you will have a lot of jobs in your life. You will go through a great deal of money. You will have a limited ability to do the right thing and far fewer to repair past wrong things.