Impossible to Possible

"Nuts!"

Tim Schneider, Coach, Speaker, Author and Trainer from Aegis Learning

By Tim Schneider

Admittedly, I struggle with anyone pronouncing impossibility. Sticks in my craw and creates an internal bristle. Okay, maybe more than a bristle.

Impossibility is declared most commonly in “I can’t” type of statements. To wit: “I can’t survive on my own”, “I can’t learn that technical stuff”, “I don’t have enough time or resources”, “My situation won’t allow that”, “I don’t do sales”, “We can’t compete against that”.

Seems the declaration of impossibility is very easy to speak and painfully effective in providing cover for comfort, complacency and failure to challenge oneself.

For the effective leader, and the high-performing team/organization, challenging impossibility must occur daily. Nothing is impossible when both attitude and effort are aligned.

December, 1944 offers some great historical lessons on the impossible becoming highly successful.

The Impossible Situation

Outnumbered five-to-one, low on supplies and painfully short on cold weather gear, the 101st Airborne Division was surrounded in the town of Bastogne. The German advance, later to be named The Battle of the Bulge, was spearheaded by multiple Panzer divisions, Wehrmacht German infantry and the feared Waffen SS.

General Heinrich Von Luttwitz sent a demand to surrender to all American forces under siege in Bastogne.

The December 22, 1944 reply from Brigadier General Anthony McAuliffe: “Nuts!”.

McAuliffe openly defied the logic of impossible and chose to reposition his attitude to one of defiance and resolve. Understanding the risks and consequences, he chose to move forward against impossible odds and even the advice of subordinate commanders.

The Impossible Solution

On December 19, 1944, Supreme Allied Commander, Dwight Eisenhower, called a meeting of all senior theater commanders. Searching for a solution, he asked General George Patton about the amount of time needed to disengage his troops from the heavy fighting in the south of Germany and relieve the 101st Airborne Division.

“48 hours” General Patton replied.

Eisenhower challenged Patton and suggested this approach was impossible. He even inferred General Patton was a bit crazy for this outlandish solution.

By December 21, 133,000 vehicles and six full divisions of Patton’s 3rd Army were on the move north. Elements of the 4th Armored Division entered Bastogne on December 26.

The impossible solution was achieved.

Patton’s choice was daring and defied the expert’s conclusions that it could not be done. His solution also flew in the face of all historical references of past performance. The general had a little trick though. He anticipated the need and pre-planned three strategies for disengaging from his current position and moving north prior to being asked.

Impossible to Possible

As with great historical battles and struggles, we too, are faced with the seemingly impossible. Here are some strategies to convert impossible to possible:

1. Stop listening to anyone that declares a situation impossible. Shun them. Run from them.

2. Create an incremental plan, with measurable milestones, of how to conquer the challenge. Breaking impossible into small parts makes something look much more possible. You don’t have to learn everything about technology in one day. You can start with a single application or even how the hardware works.

3. Remove the demons from your attitude by stop echoing and providing the self-talk of can’t or difficult.

4. Use a pause when negative and self-defeating language is about to come out of your mouth or flow through your fingers. Is it really “can’t”?

5. Challenge your own personal comfort, convenience and complacency. Growth and moving out of your current spot is hard. But it’s a lot easier than roasting in the misery of sameness.

6. Use history for the lessons of possible and not the failures of prior ventures. Yes, someone else tried it and it was an epic failure, but that was someone else. Not you.

7. Dream big and reconcile to reality. Shoot for big outcomes and targets. You can always reel those back to certain reality points but start with something that truly appears impossible.

Tim Schneider

Tim Schneider is the founder, CEO and lead facilitator for Aegis Learning.  

Opening the Listening Channels

Listening Barriers

Tim Schneider, Coach, Speaker, Author and Trainer from Aegis Learning

By Tim Schneider

An overlooked facet of the leadership communication puzzle is the ability to listen effectively. Listening skills, when not properly engaged will result in significant communication and relational disconnects with peers and team members.

The easiest method of improving the listening side of communication is to manage the environment in which listening is performed. If the dialog is important, and not just to you, the environment must be conducive to listening. This means that interruptions and distractions must be significantly reduced or eliminated. If your phone will disrupt an important dialog, silence it. If your cellular phone vibrating will move your attention to who is calling, turn it off for an important conversation. If the traffic by your office distracts your eyes and your attention, move to a more private or less traveled location.

Two important elements to consider about distraction values and listening. First is the time investment of how long it would take you to reconnect with a conversation after distraction compared with managing the distraction in the beginning. Or worse still, how much time will it take to repair the error that you make because you missed important details in the conversation.

The final consideration related to listening distraction is the not-so-subtle message of disrespect. In a conversation, you look down to see who is calling. How does that make the other person in the conversation feel? Are they the most important or is that dependant upon who is calling you on your cell phone? This disrespectful lack of focus on listening will often cause greater dysfunction in a relationship and many times impact future approachability and trust.

Another barrier to effective listening is the concept of assumptive responding. Assumptive responding is providing a response, not based on what you just heard, but rather on what you believed was said. This can be based on the situation or with whom you are having a dialog. Imagine for a moment, a team member has spent the last several days complaining about Ed, their co-worker. The team member asks if you have a moment to talk about Ed. Regardless of what is actually said in that conversation, there is a pretty good chance that your recollection of the dialog will include the team member complaining about Ed.

Those of you that have done what you have done for a living for five or more years are more likely to be candidates of assumptive responding. Having “been there, done that” or “heard it all before” will greatly impact your ability to truly listen compared to assumptive responding. Unlike managing your listening environment, dealing with assumptive responding is a little tougher. The skill is cognitive and requires both an improved focus and a reduction in the time desired to move into response mode. The bottom line is don’t be so anxious to judge the situation and hear something coming out of your mouth.

One additional listening skill is the use of complimentary validation. This is an extraordinary skill that really improves the flow of information while validating the comments of a communication sender. Complimentary validation is providing a compliment when key information is heard or processed in the listening cycle. Many people do this almost naturally or automatically and we often comment about those people that they were great listeners or they were excellent communicators or relationship builders.

In a typical conversation, routine relational dialog occurs. When you ask what someone did this past weekend and the person in dialog responds and says “we sat around and watched the grass grow.” Right behind that comment you will need to add a complimentary statement such as “those relaxing weekends are the best, that is outstanding you were able to do that.” In another conversation, you ask where someone is from and they indicate “Pawtucket.” You fire back a comment about what a great part of the country or pretty city that is Pawtucket.

The purpose of complimentary validation is simple. You are providing the acknowledgement that you were listening and, more importantly, you are providing the communication feedback that you want to hear more and are legitimately interested in the dialog. Using this skill will allow you to obtain far more information from a person than by using more traditional validation methods.

Listening is an important element in leadership communication that must be managed as actively as the rest of the communication cycle. Failure to engage good listening skills can have an adverse reaction in relationship management and the ability to communicate effectively in the future.

Tim Schneider

Tim Schneider is the founder, CEO and lead facilitator for Aegis Learning.